Question about stacking software for deep sky images

I had to pick between DeepSkyStacker and Siril for my M31 shots last month. Everyone in my local club swears by DSS, saying it's the 'standard' and easier. I went with Siril instead because it's free and open source, and the control over pre-processing seemed better. After about 15 hours of trial and error with 200 light frames, my final image had way less noise than my friend's DSS stack. I get why people stick with what they know, but I think the automatic settings in DSS can actually limit your final result. Has anyone else made a similar switch and noticed a difference in detail?

2 comments

2 Comments

holly_sanchez759d ago

Ever think DSS just works for most people?

black.pat9d ago

Totally agree about DSS limiting you. The auto settings are a trap for new people, makes them think stacking is a one click thing. Siril forces you to learn what's actually happening to your data.